金融時報:風險資本公司的“顛簸路”

所屬教程:金融時報原文閱讀

瀏覽:

2021年10月29日

手機版

掃描二維碼方便學習和分享

風險資本公司的“顛簸路”

加利福尼亞最活躍的風險資本公司之一Google Ventures的掌舵人比爾·馬里斯(Bill Maris)警告稱，部分初創(chuàng)企業(yè)到頭來可能對不向公開發(fā)售股票，而是利用私募市場追求高整體估值的決定感到后悔。

測試中可能遇到的詞匯和知識：

valuation估值

earmarked?？顚Ｓ?/p>

negotiate談判

surplus剩余額，順差

grumble抱怨

cloak-and-dagger有關陰謀或間諜的

aligned對準的

Bumpy ride for Google Ventures （764words）

By Richard Waters in San Francisco

If there is anything holding back Google's venture capital arm, it is not a shortage of money or ambition. But with competition for investments driving up valuations of private technology companies, even having the backing of the world's most powerful internet company is not a guarantee of finding enough good deals.

Google Ventures, which will be renamed GV this week, invested 20 per cent less this year than last, even as the amount of capital it has earmarked for start-up investing has risen, according to chief executive Bill Maris. The number of companies it backed also fell, dropping to 34 from 57 the previous year.

“The amount of money trying to get into investments has caused prices to go up and negotiating leverage to move to the entrepreneurs,” he says. “Capital has never been a constraint for us.” Signs that private market valuations were starting to fall in some cases made it likely that the pace of investments would pick up again next year, he adds.

The investment unit has become one of Silicon Valley's most active start-up investors, backing more than 300 companies. Among them are ride-hailing app Uber and Nest, the “smart home” start-up that was acquired outright by Google for $3.2bn.

Google has set aside $2.4bn of its surplus cash for venture investing since getting into the sector six years ago, according to an annual fund update due to be published late on Sunday. But a third of that money — representing an overhang of $300m earmarked for earlier years, along with a new $500m fund for next year — has yet to be put to work.

In one change in approach that might speed up its investing, GV is abandoning the idea of running separate funds for overseas investing, a move that Mr Maris said would give it more flexibility when deciding where to invest.

The move comes only 18 months after it set up its first international fund, with a $125m pool of cash dedicated to ventures in Europe. Instead, it is pooling investments next year in a single global vehicle.

GV has made only six investments from the $125m European fund, which was heralded as a sign of surging venture capital interest in Europe, historically a backwater for venture investing.

But Mr Maris denied that the European fund had been disappointing. While it had not met its target “dollar for dollar”, the investment pace in Europe has matched the US fund, which is also set to end the year with cash on hand.

Meanwhile, following the reorganisation of Google into tech holding company Alphabet, the investment arm is this week renaming itself GV. The new name is partly to distance it from the company's internet business, now a separate subsidiary, and tackle perceptions about possible conflicts of interest.

There have always been grumblings from rivals, says Mr Maris, that “‘GV is a secret cloak-and-dagger unit of Google'”, set up to scour Silicon Valley for new ideas to feed Google's own business or to act as a pipeline for acquisitions.

“The minute that happens we're done — that's the end of the business,” he says. “There is not a single case that supports that mythology. The company gets no information from us, we're a shareholder just like any other. My interests are aligned with entrepreneurs and the other shareholders and not Google.”

As the ambitions of the wider Alphabet conglomerate expand, GV is already finding increasing overlap between its investments and other parts of the group.

One of the business ideas Google has considered for its driverless cars, for instance, has been a taxi-like service that might compete with Uber. Mr Maris says overlaps such as this are unavoidable but can be managed. Of Uber, he adds: “It's hard to believe that any companies of that size and scale don't compete with some aspect of what Google and Alphabet are doing.”

GV's move into life sciences — now the largest part of its activities, accounting for 31 per cent of the money it put to work this year — also potentially puts it into competition with Calico, a division of Alphabet run by Art Levinson, a former chief executive of biotechnology group Genentech.

To tackle some of the most ambitious new treatments with the potential to benefit large numbers of people, Mr Maris said the fund was planning to set aside $100m a year for the next two years that would be channelled into its three best ideas. That puts it on a more direct collision path with Calico, though Mr Maris says he does not discuss investment ideas with Mr Levinson.

請根據(jù)你所讀到的文章內容，完成以下自測題目：

1.What will happened if the amount of money trying to get into investments?

A.prices to go up

B.price fall

C.negotiating leverage to move to the banks

D.get more ad opportunities

答案(1)

2.How many companies are backing from GV?

A.less than 300

B.more than 400

C.about 320

D.only 3