抗議特朗普禁穆令，硅谷精英變成革命者
舊金山——硅谷員工出人意料地成了革命者。作為一個(gè)群體，他們相對(duì)富有，受過良好教育，有良好的人脈關(guān)系。
While most here supported Hillary Clinton, tech workers are not the most obvious targets of President Donald Trump’s policy ideas. Many who populate the world’s richest tech companies will be just fine if the Affordable Care Act is repealed. Most will not be personally inconvenienced by the proposed Mexican border wall.
雖然硅谷的大多數(shù)人都支持希拉里·克林頓(Hillary Clinton)，但科技業(yè)者并不是特朗普總統(tǒng)政策方針中最明顯的靶子。很多人在世界上最富有的科技公司工作，就算《平價(jià)醫(yī)療費(fèi)用法案》(Affordable Care Act)被廢除也影響不大，而且擬議中的墨西哥邊境墻也不會(huì)讓硅谷的大多數(shù)人感到不便。
Under Trump, tech workers could enjoy a windfall. They may get tax credits for child care costs, their companies may be allowed to repatriate foreign profits, and their coming income tax cuts might fund a luxury vacation or two.
在特朗普?qǐng)?zhí)政期間，科技業(yè)者可以享受到意外的好處。他們可以用兒童看護(hù)費(fèi)用抵稅，他們的公司或許可以把在外國(guó)的利潤(rùn)調(diào)撥回本國(guó)，并且他們享受的所得稅減免可以用來度上一兩個(gè)豪華假期了。
This is all by way of saying: The protests that swept through Silicon Valley and Seattle in the last two weeks were not motivated by short-term financial gain. If you want to understand why tech employees went to the mat against Trump’s executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries, you need to first understand the crucial role that America’s relatively open immigration policies play in the tech business.
就一切都是在說明：過去兩周席卷硅谷和西雅圖的抗議并不是受短期經(jīng)濟(jì)利益驅(qū)使的。如果你想了解科技業(yè)者為什么會(huì)選擇抗議特朗普對(duì)七個(gè)穆斯林占多數(shù)國(guó)家移民的禁令，你需要首先了解美國(guó)相對(duì)開放的移民政策在科技業(yè)的關(guān)鍵作用。
And you need to understand why people in tech see something cataclysmic in Trump’s executive order, and in the other immigration crackdowns waiting in the wings: the end of America’s standing as a beacon for the world’s best inventors.
你需要了解為什么科技業(yè)者從特朗普的行政命令中，以及他將要采取的其他反移民行動(dòng)中看到了災(zāi)難的跡象：美國(guó)將不再是世界上最優(yōu)秀的發(fā)明者的燈塔。
“Silicon Valley is unlikely, as a phenomenon — it is not the default state of the world,” said John Collison, an immigrant from Ireland who is a co-founder of Stripe, a six-year-old payments startup based in San Francisco.
“作為一種現(xiàn)象，硅谷并非世界的默認(rèn)狀態(tài)。”愛爾蘭移民約翰·科里森(John Collison)說。他是六年前創(chuàng)辦的舊金山支付初創(chuàng)公司Stripe的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人。
One important reason Silicon Valley can exist at all, he said, is that it is welcoming to people from far outside its borders. “I go all across the world, and every other place is asking, ‘How do we replicate Silicon Valley where we are — in London, in Paris, in Singapore, in Australia?'”
他說，硅谷可以存在的一個(gè)重要原因是，它歡迎來自外面的人。“我前往世界各地，每個(gè)其他地方都在問，‘我們?nèi)绾卧趥惗?、巴黎、新加坡、澳大利亞?fù)制硅谷?’”
The reason those places have so far failed to create their own indomitable tech hubs is that everyone there wants to come here.
這些地方迄今為止未能最終建起自己的科技中心，原因就是每個(gè)人都想去硅谷。
“The U.S. is sucking up all the talent from all across the world,” Collison said. “Look at all the leading technology companies globally, and look at how overrepresented the United States is. That’s not a normal state of affairs. That’s because we have managed to create this engine where the best and the brightest from around the world are coming to Silicon Valley.”
“美國(guó)吸引了來自世界各地的各種人才，”科里森說。“看看這些全球領(lǐng)先的科技公司，看看有多少是在美國(guó)。這不是自然成就的事情，而是因?yàn)槲覀兿朕k法創(chuàng)造了這個(gè)引擎，吸引世界上最好最聰明的人來到硅谷。”
But, Collison added, “I think that’s kind of fragile.” Under Trump, the immigrant-friendly dynamic could change — and it could bring about the ruin of U.S. tech.
但是，科里森也說，“我認(rèn)為這種情況也有點(diǎn)不牢固。”特朗普?qǐng)?zhí)政期間，對(duì)移民友好的動(dòng)態(tài)可能會(huì)發(fā)生改變，而這可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致美國(guó)科技業(yè)的毀滅。
To outsiders, this may sound alarmist, and perhaps more than a little self-righteous. Silicon Valley gets rightly rapped for talking a big game on its supposed meritocratic openness while failing on basic measures of diversity and inclusion. Women and non-Asian minorities make up a tiny fraction of the industry’s employees, and an even smaller portion of its executives and venture capitalists. In short, the tech industry is in thrall to white dudes as much as just about any other business.
對(duì)外部人士來說，這可能聽起來有點(diǎn)危言聳聽，甚至可能是非常自以為是。硅谷也因?yàn)榇笏列麚P(yáng)精英管理的開放態(tài)度，卻在基本的多樣化和包容性方面做得不夠好而遭到應(yīng)有的批評(píng)。女性和非亞裔少數(shù)族裔在該行業(yè)員工中僅占很小比例，在管理層和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資者中占的比例更小?？偠灾?，科技行業(yè)和幾乎其他所有行業(yè)一樣，由白人男性主導(dǎo)。
And yet even a casual trip through most histories of the technology industry reveals an outsize role played by immigrants.
然而，隨便回顧一下科技產(chǎn)業(yè)的大部分歷史就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)，移民在其中發(fā)揮了非常重要的作用。
Last year, researchers at the National Foundation for American Policy, a nonpartisan think tank, studied the 87 privately held American startups that were then valued at $1 billion or more. They discovered something amazing: More than half of them were founded by one or more people from outside the United States. And 71 percent of them employed immigrants in crucial executive roles.
去年，無黨派智庫美國(guó)政策國(guó)家基金會(huì)(National Foundation for American Policy)的研究員研究了87個(gè)私人控股的美國(guó)初創(chuàng)公司，當(dāng)時(shí)這些公司的總價(jià)值約為10億美元或更多。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個(gè)驚人的現(xiàn)象：其中逾半數(shù)的公司是由美國(guó)之外的一人或多人創(chuàng)立的。其中71%的公司在重要管理崗位上聘請(qǐng)的是移民。
Collectively, these companies, which include householdish names like Uber, Tesla and Palantir, had created thousands of jobs and added billions of dollars to the U.S. economy. Their founders came from all over the world — India, Britain, Canada, Israel and China, among lots and lots of other points around the globe.
總的來說，這些公司，包括Uber、特斯拉(Tesla)和Palantir等家喻戶曉的公司，為美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)創(chuàng)造了成千上萬個(gè)工作機(jī)會(huì)和上百億美元。它們的創(chuàng)立者來自世界各地——印度、英國(guó)、加拿大、以色列和中國(guó)，以及世界各地的其他很多地方。
There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many U.S.-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of U.S.-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay U.S.-born ones.
關(guān)于移民為什么在科技行業(yè)如此成功有很多解釋。很多美國(guó)出生的科技工作者指出，美國(guó)出生的雇員足以填補(bǔ)很多科技公司的職位空缺。研究者們發(fā)現(xiàn)，美國(guó)大學(xué)的畢業(yè)生足以填補(bǔ)科技行業(yè)的職位空缺。批評(píng)該行業(yè)對(duì)移民過于友好的人士表示，根源在于錢，科技公司利用H-1B等簽證項(xiàng)目，能夠以低于美國(guó)出生人員的價(jià)格雇傭外國(guó)員工。
But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role.
如果說這種批評(píng)在科技產(chǎn)業(yè)的某些部分是屬實(shí)的，但它忽略了硅谷頂級(jí)公司的情況。對(duì)硅谷的一個(gè)常見誤解是，它像工廠那樣運(yùn)作，按照那種觀點(diǎn)，科技公司可以雇傭世界各地的任何人來填補(bǔ)某個(gè)職位。
But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely re-imagine what widgets should do in the first place.
但是如今，大部分雄心勃勃的科技公司都不像工廠，而是更像運(yùn)動(dòng)員團(tuán)隊(duì)。他們?cè)趯ふ依詹祭?LeBrons)和布雷迪(Bradys)，也就是說，他們?cè)趯ふ沂澜缟献顑?yōu)秀的人，讓他們來想出一些全新的、從未有過的玩意，從一開始就完全重新想象各種玩意的用處。
“It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything.”
“這不是讓數(shù)十萬人加入制造工廠，”云儲(chǔ)存公司Box的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人和首席執(zhí)行官阿隆·列維(Aaron Levie)說，“而是想出一些能夠改變一切的點(diǎn)子。”
