Section B
Borderline Ridiculousness
The hardest thing about getting into Britain is walking the excessive distances around Heathrow Airport. No one has ever searched my baggage, or asked anything more than where I planned to stay and for how long. Likewise in other European countries I've visited but not so in America. When I go there not only must I make a declaration of all purchases and gifts acquired abroad, I am obliged to list every country I visited. What business is that of the Finance Department? The information probably goes into some computer, never to be removed; and while I have nothing to hide, the thought is unsettling.
This is the preferential treatment I enjoy as an American citizen. Foreign nationals have another, longer form to complete before being granted a U.S. entrance visa. The questions include: "Have you ever been a controlled substance (drug) salesman, or a sex slave or pimp?" "Do you seek to enter the United States to engage in export control violations, destructive or terrorist activities or any illegal purpose?" "Are you a member or representative of a terrorist organization?" "Have you ever ordered, caused, assisted, or otherwise participated in the torture of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion under the control, direct or indirect, of the Nazi Government of Germany, or of the government of any area occupied by, or allied with the Nazi Government of Germany, or have you ever participated in genocide?"
An untruthful answer gives authorities another arrow for their attorney's quiver. If they can't get you for pushing drugs, maybe they can deport you for denying you pushed them before. But what self-respecting terrorist would agree he belongs to a "terrorist organization"? The vagueness of the language suggests its purpose is as much rhetorical as legal. It tells the rest of the world that troublesome visitors are unwelcome.
The rhetorical intent is clearest in the question about Nazis. It sounds legal and precise, but examine it and it turns out to be ridiculously broad. Consider that Franco's Spain was an ally of Hitler's Germany. Many, if not most, of its government employees can be said somehow to have "participated in the torture" of persons on account of "political opinion". How, then, should a former Spanish official, reply to the question? And why such a particular fuss about Nazis, now that most of them are dead?
My mother is a U.S. immigrant, and my father is the son of one. So it is with personal disappointment that I observe the current tendency to keep out new arrivals. I am myself a stranger in a strange land — Italy. Because I am married to an Italian citizen, establishing residency was easy. I dropped in at our local police station and in less than two hours received my "resident permit", good for two years. If my wife and I choose to live in the U.S., however, she must apply for a visa ahead of time. This is supposed to take two months, but an attorney assures me it can easily take six. As it happens, we don't plan to live in America. It was challenging enough going there on vacation.
Shortly after our wedding, we decided to spend a couple of months in the States. Luckily I mentioned this to an embassy official first. "The immigration officer might not let her in without a green card," he warned.
"Couldn't she just enter on the 90-day tourist document, like any other citizen of the European Union?" I inquired.
"If someone's married to a U.S. citizen, the assumption is they intend to reside there," he explained.
I said my wife had no intention of moving to the U.S. She had a teaching job in Italy to return to at the end of the summer. The immigration officer might believe her or he might not, I was told. Too many foreigners slip in as tourists and then try to remain on grounds of marriage. The procedure for determining that such unions are not tricks to obtain the treasured green card takes time (sometimes separating couples for more than a year, I later learned). But surely there aren't many cases of marriage fraud involving Italians, I suggested. There would be little reason to doubt my wife's word. The official gave me a look of pity for my simplicity. "I think you can understand why we can't have one policy for white Europeans and another for Filipinos and Mexicans," he said.
So when my darling wife arrived at the airport in Washington, she wasn't wearing her wedding band, lest it provoke inconvenient questions. To be safe, she hadn't even packed it in her luggage. Nor had she flown on the same plane as myself — doing so would have meant answering "yes" when asked whether she was traveling with any member of her family. Thus, she passed unhindered through the gates. When I met her on the other side we laughed with wicked pleasure, as we'd gotten away with a crime.
Words: 834
NEW WORDS
border
n. 1. [C] (land near the) line dividing two countries or areas 邊界,邊境
2. [C] a strip that goes around or along the edges of sth. 邊,邊緣,界線
borderline
n. [C] (usu. sing.) a line that marks a border between two physical things or between ideas, conditions, feelings, etc. 國(guó)境線,邊界線;界線
ridiculous
a. worthy of laughter; silly or not reasonable 可笑的,荒謬的
ridiculousness
n. craziness 可笑, 荒謬
baggage
n. [U] all the bags that one takes when traveling 行李
likewise
ad. 1. in the same way or manner 同樣地
2. also 也,亦
declaration
n. 1. [C] a statement giving official information申報(bào)(單)
2. [C] declaring; formally announcing 宣布,宣告,聲明
oblige
v. 1. force or require (sb.) by law, agreement or moral pressure to do sth. (以法律、協(xié)議或道義上的壓力)強(qiáng)制或要求,責(zé)成;迫使(某人)做某事
2. please or help sb. esp. by doing sth. one has asked to do 幫……的忙
substance
n. 1. [C] illegal drugs 毒品
2. [C, U] material with particular physical characteristics 物質(zhì)
3. [U] importance or relationship to real facts 實(shí)質(zhì),本質(zhì),要旨
salesman
n. [C] a person whose job is selling things in a shop or directly to customers 售貨員,營(yíng)業(yè)員,推銷員
■pimp
n. [C] 拉皮條者
export
n. [C, U] action of sending (goods) to another country for sale 出口
v. send (goods) to another country for sale 出口
violate
vt. 1. break or be contrary to (a rule, principle, etc.) 違反(規(guī)定、原則、條約)
2. disturb (personal freedom, etc.) 侵?jǐn)_,侵害,侵犯
violation
n. [C, U] (an example of) violating or being violated 違反(行為),違背(行為),侵犯(行為)
terror
n. 1. [U] intense fear 恐懼,驚駭
2. [C] a person or thing causing terror 引起恐怖的人或物
terrorist
n. [C] a person who supports or participates in terror activities 恐怖主義者,恐怖分子
illegal
a. (esp. of an activity or action) against the law; not allowed by law 不合法的,非法的
torture
n. [C, U] (the act of causing) great physical pain in order to persuade sb. to do sth. or to give information, or simply to be cruel to a person or animal 拷問,拷打,虐待
vt. cause great physical pain or mental suffering on (sb.) 拷問,折磨
origin
n. 1. parents and conditions of early life 血統(tǒng),出身;來歷
2. [C] the beginning or cause of sth. 起源,起因
indirect
a. 1. happening in addition to an intended result, often in a way that is not obvious or that is hard to understand because of its many connections 間接的
2. not following a straight line; not directly connected (to or with) 迂回的,曲折的
ally
v. (with/to) join or unite, e.g. by political agreement 與……聯(lián)盟
n. [C] a country that has agreed officially to give help and support to another one, esp. during a war; a person who helps and supports sb. else 盟國(guó);盟友
■genocide
n. [U] the murder of a whole group of people, esp. a whole nation, race, religious group, etc. 種族滅絕
arrow
n. 1. [C] 箭
2. [C] a sign or mark like an arrow 箭頭符號(hào)
attorney
n. 1. [C] a lawyer 律師
2. [C] a person appointed to act for another in business or legal matters 代理人
▲quiver
n. 1. [C] a thing used for carrying arrows 箭囊,箭筒
2. a shaking sound or movement 震顫聲; 顫動(dòng)
vi. shake slightly, often because of strong emotion (因強(qiáng)烈感情而)顫抖,發(fā)抖
▲deport
vt. force (a person) to leave a country, esp. because he has no legal right to be there or because he has broken the law 驅(qū)逐(某人)出境(尤指因無合法居留權(quán)或違反法律)
vague
a. 1. not clearly expressed, known, described or decided 含糊的,不明確的,不清楚的,模糊的
2. not clearly seen; not clear in shape (輪廓等)模糊的
vagueness
n. [U] being vague 不清楚,含糊
◆rhetoric
n. 1. [U] clever and persuasive language which is not genuine or has no real meaning 虛夸的言辭,華麗詞藻
2. [U] (art of) using language impressively or persuasively 修辭(學(xué));修辭藝術(shù)
rhetorical
a. 1. full of rhetoric in order to be seen as important or persuasive 浮夸的,詞藻華麗的
2. 修辭的
legal
a. 1. connected with the law 法律的
2. allowed by the law 合法的
fuss
n. [U] show of worry or excitement, often one which is greater than usual 忙亂,大驚小怪,過分激動(dòng)
vi. give too much attention to small and unimportant matters, usu. in a way which shows that one is anxious and not relaxed (為小事)煩惱,瞎操心,過于憂慮
shortly
ad. in a short time; not long; soon 立刻,馬上
embassy
n. [C] the group of people who represent their country in a foreign country, or the building they work in 大使館全體人員;大使館
document
n. [C] a paper, form, book, etc. giving information about sth. 證件;文件;公文
inquire (enquire)
v. ask for information 打聽,詢問
assumption
n. 1. [C] a thing accepted as true or as sure to happen, but not proved 假設(shè),假定
2. [U] the act of taking on (a position, etc.) 擔(dān)任,奪取
procedure
n. [C] a set of actions which is the accepted way of doing sth. 過程,步驟,常規(guī)
▲fraud
n. 1. [C, U] (an act of) cheating sb. illegally in order to make money or get goods 欺騙(行為)
2. [C] a person that cheats others 騙子
simplicity
n. 1. the negative quality of simple-mindedness 頭腦簡(jiǎn)單
2. the positive quality of being simple 簡(jiǎn)樸;簡(jiǎn)便;簡(jiǎn)單
darling
a. loved deeply 心愛的,可愛的
n. a person who is greatly loved or liked 心愛的人,親愛的人
band
n. 1. [C] a thin flat strip used to bind things together 帶,箍
2. [C] a group of people who share the same interests or beliefs, or who have joined together for a special purpose 一伙(人),一幫(人)
3. [C] a group of musicians who play modern music together 樂隊(duì)
lest
conj. in order to prevent any possibility that (sth. will happen) 以免
provoke
vt. 1. cause (sth.) to happen 致使,引起
2. (try to) make (a person or an animal) angry 挑釁,激怒
PHRASES AND EXPRESSIONS
get into
be allowed to enter (使)被允許進(jìn)入
seek to do sth.
try to do sth.; attempt to do sth. 試圖做,企圖做
engage in sth.
take part in sth. 從事……
participate in
take part in or become involved in (an activity) 參與,參加
push drugs
sell illegal drugs 販賣毒品
on account of
because of 因?yàn)?br />
keep out
(cause to) stay or not enter (使)不進(jìn)入;(使)遠(yuǎn)離
drop in
pay an unplanned visit (to a person or place) without notice or warning before going 順便拜訪
ahead of time
earlier than expected or before an arranged time(比原定時(shí)間)提早
on vacation
away from work or school for fun or rest 度假
a couple of
a small number of 幾個(gè)
let in
allow to come in 讓……進(jìn)來,使……入內(nèi)
have no intention of doing sth.
have absolutely no plan or desire to do sth. 沒有意圖做(某事)
on grounds of
by reason of 出于……的原因
get away with sth.
not be punished for sth. 不因某事受懲罰
PROPER NAMES
Britain
大不列顛(大不列顛及北愛爾蘭聯(lián)合王國(guó)的簡(jiǎn)稱,即英國(guó))
Heathrow
(英國(guó)倫敦的)希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)
Nazi
(德國(guó))國(guó)社黨黨員,納粹分子
Franco's Spain
佛朗哥(1892-1975)統(tǒng)治下的西班牙
Hitler
希特勒(1889-1945,納粹德國(guó)元首、頭號(hào)戰(zhàn)犯,發(fā)動(dòng)了第二次世界大戰(zhàn),戰(zhàn)敗后自殺)
Spanish
西班牙的
Italy
意大利(南歐國(guó)家)
Italian
意大利的
Filipino
菲律賓人
Mexican
墨西哥人
Washington
華盛頓(美國(guó)首都)
發(fā)生在邊境線上的荒唐事
進(jìn)入英國(guó)最難的事要數(shù)在希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)用兩條腿去走那段實(shí)在是太長(zhǎng)的路了。 沒有任何人來查我的行李,除了有人來問我打算住在哪里、住多久之外,就再?zèng)]有人來問我什么了。 我訪問過的其他歐洲國(guó)家也是如此,但美國(guó)卻不是這樣。 我到了那里,不但要申報(bào)所有我在國(guó)外購買的東西和收到的禮物, 還得把每一個(gè)我去過的國(guó)家的名字列出來。 這和財(cái)政部的職責(zé)有什么相干? 這些信息很可能會(huì)存入某臺(tái)電腦,永遠(yuǎn)也不會(huì)刪除。雖然我沒有什么東西可以隱瞞的,但一想到這些總讓我感到不安。
這還是我作為美國(guó)公民所享受到的優(yōu)待呢。 外國(guó)人在獲得入境簽證之前所填的表格更長(zhǎng)。 其問題包括:你做過受管制藥物(毒品)的推銷員嗎? 做過性奴隸或皮條客嗎?你到美國(guó)會(huì)從事違反出口管制的活動(dòng)、破壞性或恐怖性活動(dòng)、或任何其他非法活動(dòng)嗎? 你是恐怖主義組織的成員或代表嗎? 你是否在德國(guó)納粹政府、或任何被納粹德國(guó)政府占領(lǐng)、或與之結(jié)盟地區(qū)的政府的直接或間接控制下,因?yàn)榉N族、宗教、國(guó)籍或政治觀點(diǎn)的原因,而下令、致使、幫助或以其他方式參與了對(duì)任何人的拷打嗎?你曾經(jīng)參與過滅絕種族的大屠殺嗎?
一個(gè)不真實(shí)的回答會(huì)給當(dāng)局者的律師提供又一個(gè)整人的口實(shí)。 如果他們不能因?yàn)榉欠ㄤN售毒品而抓住你,他們也許會(huì)因?yàn)槟惴裾J(rèn)自己以前非法銷售過毒品而把你驅(qū)逐出境。 但是哪一個(gè)有自尊的恐怖分子會(huì)承認(rèn)他屬于一個(gè)"恐怖主義組織"呢? 這種意義含糊的語言表明表格的目的不但是修辭性的而且是法律性的。 它要向世界上其他地方表明的是:想搗亂的訪問者是不受歡迎的。
其修辭意圖在有關(guān)納粹分子的問題上表現(xiàn)得最為清楚。 它聽上去很符合法律,也很明確,但仔細(xì)查看一下,這問題就寬泛得荒唐可笑。 仔細(xì)想一下: 佛朗哥治下的西班牙是希特勒德國(guó)的一個(gè)盟國(guó), 它的許多政府雇員,雖然不是大多數(shù),似乎都可以被假定為曾因 "政治觀點(diǎn)的原因"參與了"對(duì)人的折磨"。 那么一個(gè)前西班牙官員又該怎樣來回答這個(gè)問題呢? 鑒于大多數(shù)納粹分子都已死去,為什么還要對(duì)他們表示特別的緊張不安呢!
我母親是美國(guó)的一個(gè)移民,而我父親則是移民的兒子。 所以我是帶著我個(gè)人的失望心情來看待目前當(dāng)局阻止移民美國(guó)的傾向的。 我本人也是個(gè)身在異鄉(xiāng)--意大利--的一個(gè)異客。 因?yàn)槲腋晃灰獯罄窠Y(jié)了婚,因此申請(qǐng)定居意大利很容易。 我只是順道去了一下我們當(dāng)?shù)氐木穑坏?小時(shí)就拿到了有效期為2年的"居住證"。 但是如果我和妻子決定居住在美國(guó)的話,她必須提前申請(qǐng)簽證。 一般認(rèn)為這需要2個(gè)月,但是一位律師很肯定地對(duì)我說這很可能需要6個(gè)月。 我們幸好不打算住在美國(guó), 但要到那里去度假也是夠惱人的。
婚后不久我們決定去美國(guó)住一、二個(gè)月。 幸好我事先向一位大使館官員提起了這件事。 他警告我說:"沒有綠卡,移民官員可能是不會(huì)讓她入境的。"
"難道她不可以像歐盟國(guó)家之間的公民那樣憑90天的旅游證件進(jìn)入美國(guó)嗎?" 我詢問道。
"如果誰與美國(guó)公民結(jié)了婚,那就被認(rèn)為他們是打算在那里定居,"他解釋道。
我說我的妻子無意移居美國(guó)。 在夏天結(jié)束時(shí),她還要回意大利去從事教學(xué)工作。 我被告知大使館移民官員興許會(huì)相信她、興許不會(huì)。 以旅游者身份進(jìn)入美國(guó)、然后以結(jié)婚為理由留下來的外國(guó)人太多了。 要確認(rèn)這種婚姻并不是為了取得寶貴的綠卡而耍的花招,需要費(fèi)很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間 (我后來知道,它有時(shí)會(huì)使夫妻分居1年多)。 但牽涉到意大利人的結(jié)婚騙局案肯定不會(huì)多, 我這樣對(duì)他說。 幾乎沒有理由來懷疑我妻子的話。 這個(gè)移民官員覺得我太天真而同情地看了看我。 他說:"我認(rèn)為你能理解我們不能為歐洲的白人制訂一項(xiàng)政策,然后再為菲律賓人和墨西哥人制訂另一項(xiàng)政策。"
所以當(dāng)我的愛妻到達(dá)華盛頓的機(jī)場(chǎng)時(shí),她沒有戴她的結(jié)婚戒指,惟恐它會(huì)引起令人難堪的問題。 為了安全起見,她甚至沒有把它放進(jìn)行李。 她也沒有和我乘同一架飛機(jī)--如乘同一架飛機(jī)將意味著當(dāng)人們問她是否和任何家庭成員一起乘機(jī)時(shí),她必須回答"是"。 就這樣, 她毫無阻礙地通過了機(jī)場(chǎng)的大門。 當(dāng)我在機(jī)場(chǎng)門外和她碰頭時(shí),我們帶著一種惡作劇的快樂大笑起來,因?yàn)槲覀兎噶私?,卻逍遙法外。