哥本哈根峰會(huì)落幕 風(fēng)雨過(guò)后未見彩虹

經(jīng)過(guò)一場(chǎng)通宵會(huì)議后，一位代表打起了瞌睡。

聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候峰會(huì)上周六在代表們的徹夜激辯后結(jié)束；會(huì)議最終在中國(guó)和美國(guó)斡旋下通過(guò)了一份不具法律約束力的協(xié)議，其關(guān)鍵細(xì)節(jié)模糊不清。

The United Nations summit on climate change ended Saturday with a fractious all-night debate over an agreement brokered by China and the U.S. that has no legal force, and is vague on crucial details.

由于美國(guó)、中國(guó)、歐洲以及內(nèi)部尚存分歧的發(fā)展中國(guó)家陣營(yíng)對(duì)如何正確應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化存在根本分歧，此次為期兩周、有將200個(gè)國(guó)家代表出席的會(huì)議幾乎以徹底失敗而收?qǐng)觥Ｔ跁?huì)議臨近尾聲時(shí)美國(guó)總統(tǒng)奧巴馬(Obama)和中國(guó)總理溫家寶牽頭匆忙進(jìn)行了一番討價(jià)還價(jià)，大會(huì)終于在周六早間大會(huì)的最后時(shí)刻達(dá)成了這一非約束性協(xié)議；而它僅得到了與會(huì)代表們溫吞水般的支持，此時(shí)徹夜激烈交鋒的外交官們已是集沮喪、憤怒與疲憊于一身，而且他們當(dāng)中有許多人都抱怨沒(méi)能參與最后協(xié)議的制定。

The fundamental disagreements over the appropriate response to climate change among the U.S., China, Europe and a divided group of developing nations led to a near total breakdown of talks during the two-week summit attended by representatives of nearly 200 nations. The non-binding final statement, produced in a flurry of last-minute bargaining led by U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, received a tepid endorsement Saturday morning after hours of angry exchanges among frustrated, hungry and tired diplomats, many of whom complained that the final agreement was made without their participation.

會(huì)議聲明稱各國(guó)應(yīng)該致力于長(zhǎng)期合作以應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化，然而它并未給任何國(guó)家設(shè)定任何具體減排目標(biāo)。

The statement said countries would 'enhance our long-term cooperative action to combat climate change,' but it didn't obligate any country to meet a specific emission-reduction target.

這份《哥本哈根協(xié)議》(Copenhagen Accord)的確促成發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家承諾，將為幫助發(fā)展中國(guó)家應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化、采用低碳技術(shù)提供數(shù)百億美元資金。工業(yè)化國(guó)家表示，將在未來(lái)三年中提供將近300億美元，并承諾在2020年前每年湊集近1,000億美元。

The Copenhagen Accord did produce a pledge by rich countries to send billions of dollars to the developing world to help it cope with the effects of climate change and to implement lower-carbon technologies. Industrialized countries said they would provide a pot of money 'approaching' billion over the next three years and to 'commit to a goal of mobilizing' 0 billion annually by 2020.

然而在當(dāng)前全球經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的背景下，沒(méi)有人具體說(shuō)明錢從何來(lái)。一些追蹤近年來(lái)國(guó)際氣候問(wèn)題對(duì)話的分析人士指出，300億美元的資金承諾基本上是照搬富裕國(guó)家此前的承諾。至于2020年前每年所需的1,000億美元資金，美方官員說(shuō)這將主要來(lái)自于私人領(lǐng)域，尤其是通過(guò)買賣碳額度來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)，政府并不會(huì)為此自掏腰包。

Yet amid the global recession, no one offered details on where that money might come from. Some analysts who have followed international climate talks for years said the billion pledged appeared mainly to restate previous offers from rich countries. As for the 0 billion a year by 2020, U.S. officials said the vast majority of it would come from the private sector, in particular through the buying and selling of 'carbon credits,' and not from government coffers.

談判代表希望將這份《哥本哈根協(xié)議》以最佳面貌示人，他們說(shuō)這只是第一步，明年將據(jù)此跟進(jìn)推出一份更具體、更具可執(zhí)行性的國(guó)際氣候協(xié)議。然而，鑒于峰會(huì)結(jié)束時(shí)與會(huì)代表在一份更強(qiáng)硬的氣候協(xié)議將如何影響自己國(guó)家競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的問(wèn)題上仍各執(zhí)一詞、分歧未減，他們說(shuō)自己也不知道后續(xù)進(jìn)程將怎樣展開。

Negotiators sought to put the best face possible on what they dubbed the Copenhagen Accord, calling it a first step that they hoped to follow up with a more-detailed, and more-enforceable, international climate pact sometime over the next year. But given that negotiators left Copenhagen as divided as ever over how a tougher agreement might affect each of their countries' economic competitiveness, they said they couldn't predict how the process might unfold.

哥本哈根混亂的會(huì)議進(jìn)程和含糊的討論結(jié)果讓很多人質(zhì)疑，在聯(lián)合國(guó)框架下到底能不能產(chǎn)生一個(gè)大幅削減溫室氣體排放的協(xié)議。聯(lián)合國(guó)框架保證所有國(guó)家都要有發(fā)言權(quán)，結(jié)果讓談判停滯不前，10多天的時(shí)間里都在爭(zhēng)論程序上的問(wèn)題，互不信任，直到各國(guó)政府領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人在上周臨近周末時(shí)抵達(dá)，才敲定了這份兩頁(yè)半的表明決心的聲明。

Copenhagen's messy process and vague outcome led many to question whether a U.N. process will ever produce an agreement to seriously slash greenhouse-gas emissions. The process's guarantee that all nations will have a say led the talks to bog down for more than 10 days of procedural wrangling and mutual distrust before their heads of government swooped in late last week and hammered out the 2 1/2-page statement of resolve.

現(xiàn)在，聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候進(jìn)程將化分為將來(lái)的一系列會(huì)議。聯(lián)合國(guó)秘書長(zhǎng)潘基文(Ban ki-Moon)和其他很多談判代表上周六表示，他們希望在下一次聯(lián)合國(guó)年度氣候峰會(huì)（明年年底于墨西哥召開）以前敲定具體問(wèn)題。

The U.N. climate process will tumble now into a series of future meetings. U.N. Secretary General Ban ki-Moon and many other negotiators said Saturday they hoped to hash out the specifics by the next big annual U.N. climate summit, scheduled for late next year in Mexico.

潘基文說(shuō)，我們本應(yīng)達(dá)成一項(xiàng)具有法律約束力的條約；這樣一種談判進(jìn)程非常復(fù)雜。他提到，兩天里他只睡了兩個(gè)小時(shí)，自周五用過(guò)午餐后就沒(méi)再吃過(guò)一頓飯。

'Ideally speaking, we should have a legally binding treaty,' said Mr. Ban, noting that he had slept two hours in two days and hadn't eaten a meal since Friday lunch. 'This kind of negotiation process is very complex.'

如果在二氧化碳排放方面制定出有約束力的限制措施，鋼鐵、發(fā)電、石油和化工等許多行業(yè)將受到影響。無(wú)約束力的《哥本哈根協(xié)議》無(wú)法明確對(duì)這些行業(yè)在碳排放方面的監(jiān)管政策。如果能明確這些監(jiān)管政策，私人投資就有可能涌入各種低碳技術(shù)領(lǐng)域，從事能效更高的火力發(fā)電站設(shè)備、電動(dòng)汽車和太陽(yáng)能電池板等產(chǎn)品的開發(fā)。

For industries that would be affected by binding limits on carbon-dioxide emissions -- steelmakers, power generators, oil companies and chemical manufacturers among many -- the non-binding Copenhagen Accord failed to provide the regulatory certainty that could unleash private investment in lower-carbon technologies, from more-efficient coal-fired power-plant machinery to electric cars to solar panels.

國(guó)際商會(huì)(International Chamber of Commerce)能源與環(huán)境委員會(huì)主席科比爾(Laurent Corbier)周末發(fā)表聲明說(shuō)，商界在尋求可預(yù)測(cè)性，以利于未來(lái)全球投資計(jì)劃的制定。

'Business is seeking predictability to help plan its future global investments,' Laurent Corbier, chairman of the International Chamber of Commerce's energy-and-environment commission, said in a statement over the weekend.

由于哥本哈根的聲明沒(méi)有約束力，它不需要充當(dāng)未來(lái)談判的基礎(chǔ)。

Because the Copenhagen statement isn't binding, it needn't form the basis of any future negotiations.

周六，在《哥本哈根協(xié)議》達(dá)成后，當(dāng)正式會(huì)議行將結(jié)束時(shí)，中國(guó)的一位談判代表提醒其他與會(huì)者說(shuō)，這不是一份條約，不需要被簽署或同意。

'It's not a treaty,' one Chinese negotiator reminded his colleagues as the official session was winding up Saturday, following agreement on the Copenhagen Accord. 'It's not going to be signed or agreed to.'

潘基文提醒注意，協(xié)議要求各國(guó)在明年1月31日以前在附錄中自愿列入其限制排放的自愿承諾。哥本哈根會(huì)議召開前，美國(guó)、中國(guó)、歐盟和巴西等主要經(jīng)濟(jì)體已經(jīng)做出了這種自愿承諾。而在許多科學(xué)家及一些國(guó)家的政府看來(lái)，要想避免氣候變化導(dǎo)致的危險(xiǎn)后果，2050年前的溫室氣體減排量必須超過(guò)這些自愿承諾的數(shù)量。

Mr. Ban noted that the pact gives countries until Jan. 31 to voluntarily list, in an annex to the accord, voluntary pledges to curb their emissions.Major economies -- including the U.S., China, the European Union and Brazil -- made such pledges in the lead-up to Copenhagen. Those pledges fall short of the severe cuts that many scientists, and some governments, have said are necessary by midcentury to avoid potentially dangerous consequences from climate change