中國(guó)正研究土地使用權(quán)續(xù)期方案

China’s leaders are pondering how to solve a simmering problem which is increasingly worrying the country’s home owners – what to do when decades-long private leases on land expire.

中國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人正在仔細(xì)考慮如何解決一個(gè)醞釀中的、讓中國(guó)住房所有者越來(lái)越擔(dān)心的問(wèn)題：幾十年年限的土地租約到期后該怎么辦。

All mainland Chinese land is state-owned, but use rights for periods ranging from 20 to 70 years have been granted since the 1990s.

中國(guó)內(nèi)地所有土地都?xì)w國(guó)家所有，不過(guò)自上世紀(jì)90年代以來(lái)，土地使用權(quán)可以20年至70年的年限得到出讓和轉(zhuǎn)讓。

The low end of that range came to national attention in April, when the eastern city of Wenzhou told local homeowners who held 20-year usage rights that they had to pay a third of their homes’ value to renew them.

今年4月，這一年限范圍的低端引起了全國(guó)的注意。當(dāng)時(shí)，中國(guó)東部城市溫州向當(dāng)?shù)負(fù)碛?0年使用權(quán)的住房所有者表示，他們須支付其住房?jī)r(jià)值的三分之一才能延續(xù)其使用權(quán)。

That sparked an outcry from middle-class families across the country who have poured their savings into property, the ultimate fate of which has never been fully resolved under Chinese law.

此舉引發(fā)了已將存款投入房產(chǎn)的全國(guó)中產(chǎn)家庭的強(qiáng)烈抗議。在中國(guó)的法律框架下，房產(chǎn)的最終命運(yùn)問(wèn)題從未得到徹底解決。

The central government’s powerful State Council is researching how to extend usage rights for urban land, according to an official dispatch by the official Xinhua news agency which provided little detail on what measures might be adopted.

根據(jù)中國(guó)官方新聞機(jī)構(gòu)新華社(Xinhua)發(fā)布的一則官方消息，中國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)院正在研究城市土地使用權(quán)如何續(xù)期的問(wèn)題。不過(guò)，該消息并未透露有關(guān)可能采取何種措施的細(xì)節(jié)信息。

The guidelines, which state media said were published Sunday, appear to pick up on a 2007 property law which asserted land use rights could be renewed, but failed to specify how that would happen.

官媒表示這一指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn)是在上周日發(fā)布的，該指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn)似乎援引了2007年的《物權(quán)法》，該法律規(guī)定土地使用權(quán)可以續(xù)期，但未能指出具體如何續(xù)期。

They also include exhortations to limit the conflicts that arise from ubiquitous government land grabs, as well as calls to grant greater property rights to farmers. But there was no indication Beijing intends to grant farmers full private ownership of their plots, collectively ownership of which enabled local officials to expropriate land in the first place.

該意見(jiàn)還敦促限制無(wú)處不在的政府征地引發(fā)的沖突，并呼吁賦予農(nóng)民更多財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利。不過(guò)，沒(méi)有跡象表明中國(guó)政府有意賦予農(nóng)民對(duì)其土地的全部私有權(quán)。歸根到底，正是對(duì)這些土地的集體所有權(quán)，令地方官員可以征用土地。